Is Feminism Deaf to the Women in Islam?

Gramfan, a mother and concerned citizen, has an excellent article over at Muslims Against Shariah about feminism and Islam. Here is an excerpt:
All too often I see stories of honour killings, rape, female genital mutilation, subservience, domestic (and other) violence, forced marriage and utter discrimination perpetrated against women in Muslim countries and now also in the West.

Some women are getting hymenoplasties and buying repair kits before they marry.

Some are being recruited as homicide bombers.

One is punished for drinking beer, others face lashings or stonings.

An Australian Islamist tries to justify polygamy for everyone.

There are women who suffer terribly from acid attacks quite frequently.

Women in Gaza are not allowed to ride motorcycles, and Somali women are being scrutinised when wearing a bra!

Where's Germaine when you need her, or would this make her happy I wonder?

And recently we have the on-going case of Rifka Bary who, as a minor, cannot chose her religion, and could become a victim of honorcide for apostasy. If she is sent back to her parents her fate is unknown. If she is allowed to remain alive the Islamists can deny honorcide even exists. This is happening in the USA now.

Yet in spite of these incidents feminists like Naomi Wolfe manage to defend discrimination towards women in Islam and it then takes a compassionate feminist, Phyllis Chesler, who has actually lived in a Muslim country, to sort it out for her!

I know many feminists, and women in general, can be fearless fighters.

Code Pink, for example, have gone to Iraq and Afghanistan. True, they are an anti-war movement, but perhaps, just perhaps, they could have drawn some attention to the women who live and suffer in the war zones they are so adamantly against.

They could have easily added one more mission statement to what is on their website which mentions "social justice".

Indeed, any other anti-war group could easily have done the same. I know they do not define themselves as feminists per se, but why not do more?

Could they not have met with Malalai Joya and offered some help?

Indeed, could not some of our famous feminists, female politicians and celebrities who spend so much time choking on their own venom over Sarah Palin have done the same? Are they afraid?

Or are they simply not interested in the women's issues of today because they think it is another culture and therefore they shouldn't interfere. They know it isn't right but they can turn a blind eye to it, even as it happens under their noses, in their own countries.

It's a cop-out.

The improvement of the condition of women in Islam is, to me, a far loftier goal than getting to wear trousers, getting equal pay, getting an abortion on demand, and having a man treat a woman more like a man! This was definitely an "unintended consequence" for me: trivial as it may seem.

I am much heartened by the fact that progress is being made, albeit in small steps.

Kuwati women in parliament refuse to wear the veil.

An Egyptian Cleric wants to ban burquas and other facial coverings.

Honor killing or Honorcide is getting more attention.

Lubna Hussein got a lot of media attention over her sentence for wearing trousers.

Najwa Bin Laden and her son, Omar, wrote a book about their husband and father, Osama, and seem to be fearless about it. They have provided a fascinating insight into this man.

I think the real "feminist"heroines now are the ones who have literally put their lives on the line, not only for women in Islam but for the world in general.

Their goals and committment are what is truly deserving of our respect and support.
Feminists

I am referring to women like Dr Wafa Sultan, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Nonie Darwish, Supna Zaidi, Irshad Manji and women like them.

There is another one who would have possibly made it to this list: Neda Soltan.

Tragically she cannot, but in spirit she can inspire so much. I feel she deserves a mention among these brave, dedicated and fascinating women.

This is my challenge to todays feminists. Use your power again.

I am "just a Mom". I do not have your platform and power.

This is indeed a most worthy cause to support and fight for.
Read the full article here.

3 comments. Leave a comment below.:

Anonymous said...

As a true blue liberal (pot smoking, gay, agnostic vegan) I'm frightened at how far from from reality the left wing has come. Is the left so entrenched in multicultural anti-Americanism that it would rather give up all its convictions and live under sharia with Iran leading the world rather than live democraticaly with the US leading? Surely people on the left cannot have egos so big they would rather the world crumble then see the US in power.

Women Against Shariah said...

Anonymous,

Those involved with Women Against Shariah have diverse political opinions. Some are more left-wing, others are center-right. Ultimately, we all agree that human rights and individual values is something everyone must fight for.

The treatment of women, gays, ethnic minorities, religious minorities and apostates (or reformers) under ultra-orthodox societies which practice shariah law is reprehensible. The UK currently has oppressive shariah courts in place to rule on many Muslim family matters. Will the US have them soon as well? It seems entirely possible.

Multiculturalism has undoubtedly contributed to problems in Europe. We see similar trends beginning in America. The idea that we must accept certain things that societies do, such as throwing homosexuals off cliffs in accordance with shariah law or performing genital mutilation on girls, is absolute madness. Not all cultures are equal when it comes to values.

We are very much in agreement. Thank you for your comment.

Sincerely,
Women Against Shariah

Anonymous said...

"Where's Germaine when you need her, or would this make her happy I wonder?"

In 2000, Australian teen-age girls were being haunted by serial rapist stalking them around Sydney. A gang of up to 20 Lebanese Muslims would surround the victim and brutally rape her. Bilal Skaf was eventually arrested and given a 50 year sentence for leading the gang rapes. What did feminist Germaine Greer have to say? In the UK's Guardian, she is quoted to have said that she thought the 50 year sentence was too harsh, that it was racist in intent, and that the girls enticed the Muslims into raping them because they were wearing scanty Western clothes. Isn't that ironic? 35 years after feminists were arguing against blaming the rape victims for how they dress are now using that same argument to defend their Muslim buddies.

Here is a quote from a transcript of a speech Greer gave to a group of teachers in Australia regarding why she doesn't oppose the treatment of women in the Middle East: ""Well, it is just very tricky to try to change another culture. We let down the victims of rape here. We haven't got it right in our own courts. What good would it do for me to go over there and try to tell them what to do? I am just part of decadent Western culture and they think we're all going to hell fast and maybe we are all going to hell fast."

Left Wing multiculturalism gone mad.

Post a Comment

Spam and abuse will not be published. You can use some HTML tags in your comments.

Thank you for reading and commenting.