Syed Ali Geelani denounces ‘Taliban in Pakistan’

By: Dawn Media

SRINAGAR: ‘Acts of terrorism’ by Taliban extremists in Pakistan are un-Islamic, a politician campaigning for Kashmir's independence from India said Saturday.

Referring to Thursday's spate of bomb attacks in Pakistan's northwestern cities, in which 15 people were killed, Syed Ali Geelani told reporters that, ‘such attacks are forbidden in Islam as innocents are killed.’

‘Islam is a religion of peace and such attacks defame the religion,’ said the 79-year-old Geelani, who supports a two-decade insurgency against India's rule over half of Kashmir.

Geelani, who heads a faction in the region's main separatist alliance, the Hurriyat (Freedom) Conference, called on the Taliban to lay down their arms and hold peace talks with Pakistan's government.

‘Taliban leadership needs to give up violence and adopt peaceful means to get their demands addressed,’ Geelani said, warning that killings of ‘innocent people cannot be tolerated.’

Like many separatists seeking an end to India's rule over part of Kashmir, Geelani is opposed to negotiations with New Delhi until it recognises Kashmir as a disputed territory.

Last year, Geelani was among leaders of massive anti-India demonstrations in the scenic Himalayan region in which over 50 protesters were killed.

The insurgency in Kashmir, which is ruled in part by Pakistan and India but claimed in full by both, has left more than 47,000 people dead since it began in 1989.

Fears of Muslim anger over religious book

By Christine Toomey

An academic book about religious attitudes to women is to be published this week despite concerns it could cause a backlash among Muslims because it criticises the prophet Muhammad for taking a nine-year-old girl as his third wife.

The book, entitled Does God Hate Women?, suggests that Muhammad's marriage to a child called Aisha is "not entirely compatible with the idea that he had the best interests of women at heart".

It also says that Cherie Blair, wife of the former prime minister, was "incorrect" when she defended Islam in a lecture by claiming "it is not laid down in the Koran that women can be beaten by their husbands and their evidence should be devalued as it is in some Islamic courts".

This weekend, the publisher, Continuum, said it had received "outside opinion" on the book's cultural and religious content following suggestions that it might cause offence. "We sought some advice and paused for thought before deciding to go ahead with publication," said Oliver Gadsby, the firm's chief executive. The book will be released on Thursday.

A recent novel that also dealt with Muhammad's relationship with Aisha provoked an outcry. The Jewel of Medina caused such anger that a Muslim extremist was convicted earlier this month of trying to firebomb the office of its publisher.

Continuum's book may cause a backlash because it sets out to be a factual examination of religious attitudes to women. British writer Jeremy Stangroom and his American co-author Ophelia Benson, whose previous books on philosophy and science have received favourable reviews, cite ancient Islamic scholars to support their case. They roundly attack previous attempts to "soft-soap" the controversial episode in Muhammad's life. In the aftermath of 9/11, the authors argue, a wave of political correctness aimed at building bridges with the Muslim world has meant accusations of "Islamophobia" have been used to silence debate about the morality of social conduct, past and present.

Through a gruesome catalogue of abuses carried out against women in the name of Islam as well as other major religions, including Hinduism and Catholicism, Stangroom and Benson conclude that most of the world's great faiths are essentially misogynistic.

Among the many tragedies they cite are the deaths of 14 young girls in a fire at a school in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, in March 2002. The girls died after being herded back into a blazing classroom by the country's religious police because they had neglected to don black head-to-toe robes in their rush to flee to safety.

However, the most contentious section of their book is likely to be their conclusions concerning the age at which Muhammad first slept with Aisha.

While it is widely accepted that the girl's father first offered her for betrothal to Muhammad when she was just six, many argue that Muhammad married Aisha when she was nine and the union was not consummated until she reached puberty years later.

However, Stangroom and Benson cite extracts from a highly regarded historian of early Islam, Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari, who quotes Aisha as saying: "The Messenger of God consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old". The authors conclude "religious authorities and conservative clerics worship a wretchedly cruel unjust vindictive executioner of a God. . . a God who thinks little girls should be married to grown men".

Such assertions could invoke the ire of some Muslims. Anjem Choudary, a self-styled sharia judge and former leader of the banned British group Al-Muhajiroun, said: "Talk of Aisha as a child when she married is not true.

"At nine she reached her menses and in those days a girl was considered to be mature when that happened. No one will swallow talk about child brides. It would lead to a huge backlash, as we saw with The Jewel of Medina."

Muslims in fresh Athens demo over alleged Koran insult

ATHENS (AFP) — More than 1,000 Muslim migrants and leftists demonstrated in Athens Friday over an alleged police insult to the Koran, a week after two similar protests degenerated into clashes with anti-riot police.

The protest was called by leftist and anti-racist groups after a police officer allegedly tore up some sheets of paper with extracts from the Muslim holy book belonging to an Iraqi migrant during an identity check last week.

"We want this officer put on trial, and we ask the government to protect our prayer sites in Athens," said Zuri, a Moroccan protester.

"But we intend to set a good example and refrain from violence, Islam is a religion of peace," he said.

Scores of police on foot and on motorbikes were mobilised to maintain order and keep the migrants who marched on parliament from coming into contact with a few dozen neo-Nazi militants staging a street gathering a few blocks away.

The far-right group was commemorating the fall of Constantinople, capital of the Byzantine Empire, to the Ottoman Turks in 1453.

Greece's main Muslim and migrant organisations distanced themselves from the migrant demonstration, preferring to take judicial action instead.

"Our problems can be solved by dialogue, not demonstrations," said Ahmet Moavia, head of the Greek Migrants' Forum.

"The real agenda is migrants' rights in Greece which include issues of religion," he told AFP.

"Muslim Arabs will not participate because there is a political agenda which has nothing to do with Islam," said Naim El Gadour, chairman of the Muslim Union of Greece.

"We filed a complaint against the officer, we chose the path of justice and peace and we will adhere to it."

Rights groups report an increase in racist attacks on migrants in Athens in recent weeks. Last weekend, unknown assailants set fire to a basement flat housing a mosque and injured five men from Bangladesh sleeping inside.

More than a dozen migrants and police were injured last week in clashes that marred two days of Muslim rallies over the alleged insult to the Koran.

Scores of cars and a handful of shops had their windows smashed.

Police made 46 arrests at the time.

Muslim groups have demanded an apology over the incident which the government has so far failed to give. Calls to identify the officer who allegedly tore the Koranic verses have also been ignored.

Community elders also note that Greece has failed to honour years of pledges to build a mosque and a cemetery in Athens where over 100,000 Muslims live.

There are around one million migrants legally living in Greece, roughly nine percent of the country's population, most of them from neighbouring Albania.

Another 80,000-100,000 migrants are believed to be residing in the country illegally according to the interior ministry.

Trial looms for Georgia Tech jihadi

From Jihad Watch:

"And prosecutors contend in the affidavit the [terrorist] efforts [targeting Washington and Georgia] were conducted "in purported defense of Muslims or retaliation for acts committed against Muslims in the United States and in foreign nations." Looks like prosecutors will be relying on the ol' "grievances-breed-terrorism" canard.

An update on this story. "Trial looms for suspect in alleged jihad plot," by Greg Bluestein for AP, May 31:

ATLANTA (AP) — Armed with a handheld video camera, a Georgia university student drove with a friend in April 2005 to Washington, D.C., and captured scenes of the Capitol, the Pentagon and other locations.

Investigators say Syed Haris Ahmed, now 24, wasn't a tourist but a wannabe terrorist who wanted to send the videos of potential terror targets to an overseas contact. He was attending the Georgia Institute of Technology at the time.

The charges, along with an allegation that Ahmed went to Pakistan and tried to join a terrorism group a few months later, are central to a federal terrorism case against him that is set to begin Monday.

His attorney, Jack Martin, contends the federal charges are little more than "imprudent talk" and that investigators have no evidence that Ahmed, who was born in Pakistan, has committed any terrorist act.

U.S. Attorney David Nahmias, however, considers it one of his most important cases since he took charge of the office in 2004 and contends Ahmed was at the center of a plot to carry out "violent jihad" against civilian and government targets in Washington and Georgia.

Ahmed and his friend Ehsanul Islam Sadequee, both U.S. citizens who grew up in the Atlanta area, have pleaded not guilty to the charges. Sadequee's trial is scheduled to begin in August.

Federal authorities said they began to build the case after the pair hopped a bus to Toronto in March 2005 and met with at least three other targets of an FBI investigation. Authorities say they brainstormed strikes against targets that ranged from military bases to oil refineries and included a plot to disrupt the Global Positioning System satellite network.

A few months later, authorities say they drove Ahmed's pickup truck to Washington where they made the "casing" videos of the Capitol, the World Bank, a Masonic temple and a fuel depot. And they were accused of discussing an attack against Dobbins Air Reserve Base in suburban Atlanta.

Authorities also said they have evidence of more than just talk.

The two were accused of receiving "rudimentary paramilitary training" in northern Georgia in late 2004 and early 2005. And officials said Ahmed traveled to Pakistan in July 2005 to seek out Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, a Pakistan-based group linked with attacks in the disputed state of Kashmir.

Nahmias has said there is no evidence the two posed an immediate threat to the United States, but stressed that their path could eventually have led to violence.

And prosecutors contend in the affidavit the efforts were conducted "in purported defense of Muslims or retaliation for acts committed against Muslims in the United States and in foreign nations."

In court papers, Martin has accused investigators of preying on Ahmed's devotion to Islam to coax a confession and then reneging on a promise not to arrest him if he told the truth.

Martin also has cast doubt on whether prosecutors have enough evidence for a conviction. While the indictment discusses meetings, conversations and training exercises, nowhere does it say the two men obtained or tried to obtain weapons or explosives to commit terrorism.

"The case is more about talk," Martin said after a hearing.

The trial is expected to last about a week, and at the end, the federal judge will likely hear directly from Ahmed. The suspect waived his right to a jury trial this month specifically because he wants to make a public statement.

"I consider the opportunity to give the statement more important than anything to me right now," he said at a recent hearing.

Caning boys, not girls, discriminatory: Malaysian teachers

By Noor Khan

Teachers in Malaysia's Sarawak state want caning in schools to be extended to female students.

Saying that only caning school boys and not girls was discriminatory, the teachers have now proposed a comprehensive review of caning of children in schools.

It was discriminatory to exclude female students, who were only subjected to cleaning toilets and picking up litter when they committed disciplinary offences, said the Sarawak Teachers Union President William Ghani Bina.

"Caning can help in arresting the deteriorating indiscipline among girls". However, Willian said "the girls must be caned only on the palm and not other parts of the body".

He suggested that the punishment should be imposed only on secondary students and "primary kids should be spared".

The proposal came after state's Deputy Education Minister Mohd Puad Zarkashi had said on Saturday that caning would be reintroduced in schools to check indiscipline among students.

Study: 64% of Turks don't want Jewish neighbors

By News Agencies

A new study published in a Turkish newspaper Sunday said 64 percent of Turks would not want Jewish neighbors.

The study also suggested Turks had a low tolerance for diverse lifestyles in general, as three in four respondents said they would not want to live next to an atheist or anyone drinking alcohol.

The study by Istanbul's Bahcesehir University was meant to gauge radicalism and extremism in Turkey.

Results published in Sunday's Milliyet also stated that 52 percent would not want Christian neighbors, 67 would not want to live next to an unmarried couple and 43 percent would not want American neighbors.

Religious extremism and nationalism have remained level in Turkey this decade, although anti-Israeli sentiment was on the rise, said Yilmaz Esmer, a professor of political science at Bahcesehir who led the study.

Israel is the most unpopular foreign country, followed by Armenia and the United States, the study revealed. Israel is also seen as most responsible for the world's problems, followed by U.S. and EU policies, according to the survey.

A majority of Turks support their government's bid to join the European Union, the study revealed, but most say the bloc views it with prejudice because Turkey is a Muslim nation.

Three out of four Turks believe the EU is trying to divide Turkey and 81 percent believe the bloc's goal is to spread Christianity, said the study.

Despite this, 57 percent want full EU membership for Turkey.

"A majority of Turks still want EU membership, but a larger majority has very serious doubts about the EU's intentions towards Turkey," Esmer said.

One out of four Turks thinks Turkey is either already a full member of the EU or is unsure of its status, he said. Turkey has in fact been an official candidate for EU membership for 10 years and has completed only one of the 35 'chapters' in the accession process.

Sixty-two percent of Turks said religion was their priority, followed by 17 percent who said secularism was. Democratization was the top priority for 15 percent, followed by smaller numbers who cited ethnic identity and financial gain.

"The main issue for Turks is religion and secularism," Esmer said.
About 18 percent of respondents said they felt discriminated against, the highest rate in Europe, Esmer said. Still, most respondents felt that religious and ethnic diversity enriched life, rather than threatened national unity, he said.

The survey is based on interviews with 1,715 people selected randomly from 34 cities between April 12 and May 3. No margin of error was given.

Egyptian cuts off penis to torpedo marriage

Qena, EGYPT (AFP)

An Egyptian cut off his own penis on Sunday in protest at his parents' choice of bride, a police official said.

The 25-year-old laborer from the village of Sheikh Eissa in southern Egypt was taken to hospital in stable condition, the official said, adding that the man had also mutilated his testicles.

"He was in love with a woman but his parents rejected her and told him to marry another woman he didn't want. He took a knife and cut off his penis in his room."

Doctors were unable to reattach the severed member, the official said.

EastEnders' Muslim character Syed set for controversial gay storyline

From the Daily Mail:
EastEnders newcomer Marc Elliott (pictured, right) is to star in a controversial storyline which sees his Muslim character Syed Masood kiss another man.

Syed, the oldest Masood child, will kiss openly homosexual character Christian Clarke (John Partridge) (pictured, left) in a new plot, which starts next month.

After the BBC confirmed the new storyline this week, some Muslim bodies have already criticised the plot.

Warwickshire-born actor Elliott, who joined EastEnders as the Masood's mysterious long-lost son in April, has praised the soap's writers for tackling a sensitive subject.

He said: 'I think EastEnders would be doing the programme a disservice if they didn't give a voice to various communities.

'I think that's really important because I think London is a very ethnically diverse multicultural place, and EastEnders has a job to reflect that in the storylines it gives people and the characters they have on board.'

Is it the end of Nasty Nick? Walford residents flee Ian's cafe after it bursts into flames after hostage drama
Asghar Bokhari from the Muslim Public Affairs Committee said: 'The Muslim community deserves a character that represents them to the wider public because Islamophobia is so great right now.

'There's a lack of understanding of Muslims already and I think EastEnders really lost an opportunity to present a normal friendly Muslim character to the British public.'

The soap's executive producer Diedrick Santer, said he believes the controversial issue needs to be highlighted, despite risk of offending some religious viewers.

He said: 'Sometimes there's a danger of being too careful with black or Asian characters that we might go into territories that might offend.

'But it seems to me if we steer away from any controversy, they don't stand a chance of being a great EastEnders family - they'll just be in their kitchen unit making curries for years and years and that's not going to be very interesting.

'This isn't a moral tale of right or wrong; it's very much a human interest story where a young man struggles with the conflict between his faith and his feelings.

'This is not a story about Syed and Christian's physical relationship - we don't see anything beyond one kiss.

'It's more about the inner turmoil and conflict Syed endures trying to remain true to his faith while questioning his sexuality.'

Actress Nina Wadia, who plays Syed's on-screen mother Zainab, has previously said the soap needs to challenge stereotypes and misinterpretations of Muslims in Britain.

She said: 'People's perceptions of Muslims need to be challenged.

'I want people to react to what the characters do as opposed to what they do as Muslims. That's what I like about EastEnders now - they're not scared of the fact these are Muslim characters. They don't hide behind anything, they let them be.'

German terror suspects used teenager as smuggler

By Associated Press

A radical Islamic terror cell that allegedly plotted to attack US targets in Germany used a teenager to smuggle triggering devices for their bombs into the country from Turkey, an investigator testified Wednesday.

The boy, who was 15 at the time and is now 17, allegedly smuggled the fuses back to Germany in a pair of shoes in the summer of 2007, federal investigator Dirk Iserlohn told the Duesseldorf state court.

The boy, a German of Tunisian background, refused to testify but Iserlohn said that in statements the teenager made to authorities, he identified suspect Fritz Gelowicz as the person to whom he delivered the fuses. The boy has not been charged, and his name has not been released due to his age.

Gelowicz, 29, along with Adem Yilmaz, 30, Daniel Schneider, 23, and Attila Selek, 24, are accused of planning car bomb attacks on various sites, including the US Air Force's Ramstein base.

Muslim Italian Politician: "We Are the New Italians"

(AKI) - An Italian Muslim woman wearing the veil, or hijab, in the central city of Perugia will for the first time run for local elections, on 6 and 7 June. Maymouna Abdel Qader, an Italian of Palestinian descent, is a political science graduate of the University of Perugia.

She is running for Perugia's communal council for the Sinistra e Liberta coalition, which is made up of mainly socialist, anti-war and secular parties.

"Though being the first veiled Muslim woman that has ever run for elections in Italy, until now I have received a positive response from the people, who have also appreciated my choice, and look at me as a novelty of the local political scene," said Abdel Qader in an interview with Adnkronos International (AKI).

Abdel Qader - who is the daughter of the imam of Perugia Mohammed Abdel Qader and is also one of the founders of the Young Italian Muslims association - said she is personally campaigning and distributing fliers to promote her candidacy.

"These days I am personally distributing fliers for my candidacy in order to ask the citzens of Perugia for their vote. Many have wished me well, after they see that I am Italian and not a foreigner," she told AKI.

Abdel Qader also said her objective is to represent Italy's second generation of Muslim immigrants in Italy, that are now what she calls "The new Italians".

Among the things she wants to promote if elected, is that Perugia's public pool can be reserved solely for women, at least once a week.

"It is a battle that it not just limited to Muslim women. The pool will be open to all women, and I count with the support of many women about this."

Women Voice Support for Failed Islamic Terrorists

By Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu (IsraelNN.com)

The National Association of Muslim American Women (NAMAW) has charged the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) with entrapping four New York City Muslims arrested for planning to bomb a synagogue.

The cell was nabbed last week after a year-long police dragnet that involved an informant, who the Times of London reported probably is Shahed Hussain, a former New York state motel owner. He began collaborating with the FBI in 2002 to avoid deportation to Pakistan after being arrested on charges of fraud.

NAMAW appealed to the Justice Department to investigate the case, accusing the FBI of plotting to entrap the cell as part of a campaign against Muslims. It said that the FBI is “creating the illusion that all Muslims are either terrorists or potential terrorists, thereby substantiating the use of racial and religious profiling on Muslims and Arabs.

“The FBI, posing as Al Qaeda-backed militants to brainwash and coax 'vulnerable' men into the walking trap of their own foiled terrorist plot, causes grave concern to the representatives of Muslims in American society," the organization said in a statement.

Police and federal investigators, after tracking the cell, sold them fake bombs and a phony Stinger missile that the four men planned to use to attack two Jewish buildings, including a synagogue, and a National Guard air base.

The cell wanted to create “a fireball that would make the country gasp, “according to a police officer.

The Muslim women’s group, which previously has asked for a probe of Jewish lobby groups for allegedly spreading hate messages, claimed that one of those arrested has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. They also charged that the FBI informant “persuaded these men into believing that their religion obligated them to carry out acts of violence in the United States in retaliation for U.S. war crimes being carried out in the Muslim world.'

Terence Kindlon, a lawyer who defended the last terror suspect to be tried in New York State, told the Times of London, “It is almost as if the FBI cooked up the plot and found four idiots to install as defendants.”

Referring to nearly 100 law enforcement officers involved n the arrests, he added, “Did they really need all those men in ninja suits with M16 rifles to arrest four idiots? Somewhere, someone in Al-Qaeda must be laughing.”

Minorities Fleeing from Kosovo

Various non-Serb minorities who live in Kosovo are abandoning the fledgeling country because they feel discriminated against by the ethnic Albanian majority, the London-based International Minority Rights Group (MGI), says in a report published today. The report blames the ethnic Albanian Kosovar leadership for the exodus through lack of will to guarantee minority rights. Suffering from the discrimination are the Bosniacs, ethnic Turks, the Rom, the Ashkalis (a group of Egyptian origin resident for centuries in the southern Balkans), and the Gorans (ethnic Slavs who are Muslims), who together make up 5 % of the population of Kosovo. Many members of these groups, says the report, have long since left Kosovo.

"The Albanian majority lacks political will and substantial investment in favour of minority rights. If one adds the bad condition of the economy, it means that many members of those communities must now leave the new state of Kosovo." Says the report. The genesis of the discrimination is the impression that the minorities were allied to the Serb-dominated Yugoslav regime in the 1990s or did little to oppose it, the report adds.

The report criticises the international community, accusing it of having devoted excessive time to relations between the Serbs and the ethnic Albanians while ignoring the other groups. "The international community should make it a priority to guarantee that there is some kind of international mechanism favouring the human rights of minorities in Kosovo," the MGI's director, Marco Lattimer, said in an interview. Protecting the minorities would help Kosovo move forward on its path toward joining the European Union, Lattimer said. (ANSAmed).

Village woman mercilessly whipped after fatwa is issued against her

by William Gomes

The woman was punished for filing a paternity claim after her son was born out of wedlock. Village judges say they imposed punishment in accordance with Qur’anic tenets. Human rights activists describe the affair as another “example of social discrimination” and call for greater protection for women.

Dhaka (Asia News) – Rahima Akter, a woman from Noagon (Daudkandi sub-district, eastern Bangladesh), was mercilessly whipped until she lost consciousness after she dared to file a paternity claim against a married man with children. A fatwa ordering that she be whipped 100 times was issued against her by a local Islamic judge for “false testimony”. For human rights activists, the case is but another example of “social discrimination against women” based on the failure to implement laws that protect them and the overall lack of gender equality. After her public ordeal the single mother was taken to the Dhaka Medical College for medical treatment.
“Arbitration in my daughter’s case began at 8 pm on 22 May. The Mawlānā chaired the committee,” Rahima’s mother, Rasheda Begum, told AsiaNews. “She [the daughter] explained that she started an affair with Abdul Karim, who is married and father of three children. As a result of their relation, my grandson Ramzan was born.”

The young mother tried without success to get him to acknowledge paternity and this led to an arbitration hearing, which was held in the village madrassah or Qur’anic school.

“There were 200 to 400 people,” Rasheda Begum said. “My daughter swore on the Qur’an that Karim was the father, but he strongly denied it. He, too, took an oath.”

The arbitration council then ruled that the man was right, based on the Islamic legal principle that the testimony by a man is worth more than that of a woman. Therefore, Rahima was found guilty of perjury and was sentenced to be whipped 100 times.

The sentence was carried out right away, but the young woman lost consciousness after 39 blows. Her parents took her away but the conditions of the young woman were so bad that she had to be hospitalised.

Village leaders also warned the family not to file any complaint with the police, or they would suffer consequences.

Contacted by AsiaNews the doctor that treated Rahima said that when the victim arrived in hospital “she was in a really bad situation. I was shocked at the brutality of the treatment.”

On Tuesday the family too was moved to the hospital where they took DNA tests.

For security reasons, outsiders were not allowed to meet them.

Police said that they were conducting an investigation into case and announced that they already had “three of the six accused in custody after a case was filed by Abdul Matin, the father of the victim."

The men charged are Mawlānā Abul Kashem, 55; Abdul Karim, the alleged 35-year-old father; and Shah Alam, 50.

Police are also trying to apprehend the other three men involved in the case but are facing legal hurdles since the law has no provision about fatwas issued by Islamic judges.

For human rights activists the whole story is shameful. Khushi Kabir, coordinator of a human rights organisation that helps poor families, explained that “there is no specific law regulating fatwas by Islamic courts or concerning paternity.” For this reason the “government should take the proper initiative and introduce a new law.” Rahina’s case is “an example of a gross injustice against a woman.”

For Sarah Hossain, a barrister and human rights activist, the whole affair smacks of “social discrimination against women” based on the failure to implement laws to protect them.

Equality between men and women in Bangladesh remains a pipe dream because of the country’s dominant patriarchal culture which crushes every effort to emancipate women.

Despite government openness in the matter and some social groups in favour of change, Islamic legal scholars and ulemas are steadfastly opposed to gender equality because in their view it is incompatible with the Qur’an and the Sunnah, “the way and the manners of the prophet”.

In Bangladesh many women who dare rebel against their husbands or demand greater social justice have been dealt with sulphuric acid.

The first documented case goes back to 1967. Since then there has been a steady rise in the number of cases: 47 in 1996, 130 in 1997 and 200 in 1998. In 2002 more than 480 women were disfigured. In fact in October 2008 AsiaNews published the story of a young woman who was disfigured with acid by her husband because her family would not pay her dowry.

As a result of local and international awareness raising campaigns, the government adopted in 2002 a law banning throwing acid in the face of young women for economic reasons, jealousy or refusal to submit to forced sex.

So far though, only 190 cases went to trail between 2002 and 2007 out 1,428 cases filed in courts with 254 people found guilty and sentenced.

Husband, relatives shave woman’s head

KARACHI: The Malir police arrested three men who were accused of shaving a woman’s head, blackening her face and then forcing her to parade in front of the entire neighbourhood. According to details, Sakeena Jogi, 30, a resident of Hasan Panhwar Goth in Malir, was physically tortured by her husband, Leemoon Jogi, her father, Naathu alias Mastaanu, and six other accomplices.

The accused then urinated on her head before shaving it and later blackened her face and forced her to parade in front of the entire goth. She was later released after being warned with a death threat against complaining about the entire incident. However, Sakeena approached SSP Malir Javed Maher with her children and told him that when she refused the demands of her family to carryout immoral acts. She said that on the orders of the goth’s wadera, Ghani Panhwar, her family subjected her to inhuman torture and humiliation. After Sakeena’s complaint, SSP Maher, under the supervision of SPO Sukhan Jabbar Qaimkhani, formed a police team that raided the goth and arrested Naathu and two other relatives, Khamu and Ahmad, and registered cases against them.

However, Naathu has denied the allegations. According to SPO Qaimkhani, all the accused are Sakeena’s family members, adding that Sakeena had lied about wadera Panhwar because she feared that he would have helped the accused if she had registered cases only against them. He said that he has mentioned the same in the FIR.

Source: Daily Times

Christian couple convicted for anti-Muslim booklets

A Christian Singaporean couple were found guilty of sedition on Thursday for distributing evangelical publications that cast Islam in a negative light, court officials said.

Ong Kian Cheong and his wife Dorothy Chan had been charged with distributing a seditious publication to two Muslims in October and March 2007 and sending a second such booklet to another Muslim in December that same year, a district court official told AFP.

The publications were found to have promoted feelings of ill-will and hostility between Christians and Muslims, the Straits Times said on its website.

A hearing was set for June 4 for mitigation pleas and sentencing.

The sedition charge carries a jail term of up to three years or a fine of up to 5,000 Singapore dollars (3,437 US) or both.

Singapore, a multi-racial island nation, clamps down hard on anyone seen to be inciting communal tensions.

In 2005, two ethnic Chinese men were jailed for anti-Muslim blogs.

The following year, a Singaporean blogger received a stern warning after posting cartoons mocking Jesus Christ on his online journal.

Ethnic Chinese make up a majority of the city-state's resident population but there are significant numbers of Malay Muslims, ethnic Indians and other groups.

Tanzania: Radical Muslims Drive Church From Worship Place in Zanzibar

(Compass Direct News) – Worship in a house church near Zanzibar City, on a Tanzanian island off the coast of East Africa, did not take place for the third week running on Sunday (May 24) after Muslim extremists expelled worshippers from their rented property. Radical Muslims on May 9 drove members of Zanzibar Pentecostal Church from worship premises in a rented house at Ungunja Ukuu, on the outskirts of Zanzibar City.

Angered by a recent upsurge in Christian evangelism in the area, church members said, radical Muslims had sent several threats to the Christians warning them to stop their activities. The church had undertaken a two-day evangelism campaign culminating in an Easter celebration. On the morning of the attack, more than 20 church members had gathered for Saturday fellowship when word reached them that Muslim extremists were about to attack.

As the radical group approached, the Christians fled in fear of their lives. “The group was shouting, saying, ‘We do not want the church to be in our locality – they should leave the place and never come back again,’” said one church member who requested anonymity.

Taliban blow up girls’ school in Hangu

LAHORE: The Taliban destroyed a girls’ school in Hangu on Monday, a private TV channel reported. According to the channel, the Taliban had planted explosives at the government school in Shahidkhel area in the wee hours of the morning, and the consequent blast destroyed the entire building. No casualties were reported.

Source: Daily Times

Iran mosque bombing kills 15 worshippers

By Aresu Eqbali

A bomb blast at a Shiite mosque in the southeastern Iranian city of Zahedan on Thursday killed at least 15 worshippers and wounded 80 others, a local official told reporters.

The evening explosion struck the Amir al-Momenin mosque in Zahedan, the restive capital of Sistan-Baluchestan province, which has a substantial Sunni minority, the official IRNA news agency reported.

"The bomb exploded at the time of evening prayer and killed a number of worshippers," Ali Mohammad Azad, the governor general of the province bordering Pakistan and Afghanistan told reporters.

He said 15 people were killed and the wounded toll had risen to 80. "It was a terrorist attack and the bomb was exploded by a terrorist," Azad told reporters, according to IRNA.

Fars news agency reported a higher death toll, saying 20 people were killed.
Azad said soon after the explosion "members of a terrorist group who wanted to get out of Zahedan were arrested."

"The members of the terrorist group intended to explode bombs in some other areas of Zahedan, but they have been arrested due to the efforts of the provincial intelligence office."

Azad said "bandits and terrorists intended to disturb the order in the province before the election considering the insecurity in the eastern neighbouring countries."

According to IRNA, Zahedan's Friday prayer leader Ayatollah Abbas Ali Soleymani told reporters that "one of the main persons involved (in the attack) had been arrested" and "he will soon be punished in front of the mosque."

Fars said the mosque is the second biggest Shiite mosque in Zahedan and also a "gathering place for revolutionary Shiites."

The agency said no group had so far claimed responsibility for the bombing, and that security and police services were in control of the area.

On February 18, Al-Gadhir mosque in Zahedan was attacked. A bomb apparently carried by a motorcyclist exploded but caused no casualties.

The last major attack in Zahedan was a February 2007 strike by suspected Sunni rebels that killed 13 elite Revolutionary Guards.

Thursday was a public holiday in Iran to mourn the death of Fatima Zahra, the daughter of the Prophet Mohammed.

The explosion comes just weeks ahead of Iran's June 12 presidential election.
Sistan-Baluchestan province has a large ethnic Baluch minority.

In recent years, it has been the scene of a deadly insurgency by Sunni rebels of the Jundullah (Soldiers of God) group which is strongly opposed to predominantly Shiite country's government.

The province also lies on a major narcotics-smuggling route from Afghanistan and Pakistan.
In April 2008, the bombing of a packed mosque in the southern city of Shiraz during evening prayers left 14 people dead.

The strike in Shiraz was the first in decades in Iran's Persian heartland. The normally calm city is not in a border zone, nor is it home to any significant ethnic or religious minority population.

Iran has in the past blamed US and British agents based in neighbouring Iraq and Afghanistan for launching attacks on border provinces with significant ethnic minority populations.

Palestinian Arab Intellectuals Protest against Fatwas that Harm Islam

Some fatwas issued recently by jurisprudents in the Muslim world have aroused criticism and derision on the part of Palestinian academics, columnists and newspaper editors. One writer condemned jurisprudents for issuing arbitrary fatwas that serve their own personal interests, or the political interests of some body or faction - sometimes even for a fee. He also criticized their hypocrisy, saying that although they try to monopolize the faith and impose their opinion on others, they do not practice what they preach. Other articles focused on ridiculous and demeaning fatwas issued against women, such as the decree that they must wear a veil revealing only one eye.

Following are excerpts from the articles:
The Jurisprudents Issue Fatwas out of Hypocrisy, Greed, and Personal or Factional Interests

Hafez Al-Barghouti, editor of the Palestinian Authority daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, responded to a fatwa issued by Algerian Salafi sheikh Muhammad 'Ali Farkous (known as Abi 'Abd Al-Mu'izz), who prohibited the eating of a traditional pastry called zulabiyya.

"Every zulabiyya is a forbidden innovation; every innovation is a departure from the path of righteousness; and every such departure [leads straight to the fires of] Hell - though zulabiyya is fried in oil over a fire to begin with, and does not need a fatwa [to send it there].

"[I say that] it is not zulabiyya that is the forbidden innovation here, but the fatwa issued by Algerian sheikh [Muhammad] Farkous, who pronounced zulabiyya a forbidden innovation for no good [religious] reason...

"This inexplicable arbitrariness is the hallmark of many contemporary fatwas, for nearly every [cleric now claims] the authority to issue fatwas on every [conceivable] issue - economic, social, religious or political - just by virtue of being a cleric, though Islam does not [even recognize] the clerics' [authority to impose their opinions on others]...

"[Perhaps] Sheikh Farkous has connections to some pastry restaurant, and issued this fatwa [to harm the business of] a competing restaurant that serves zulabiyya. There have been many cases of financial investment firms enlisting senior clerics to issue fatwas legitimizing their activities. These fatwas, it transpires, were paid for in advance out of the investors' money, [and the investors themselves] woke up [one day] to find that the firm owners had stolen their savings and fled to Egypt or some other country.

"One [Hamas] sheikh banned participation in the 1995 Palestinian elections - but [reversed his decision] in 1996, when he [decided to] run for the Legislative Council. There are also Hamas sheikhs who, a few years ago, sanctioned the resistance and treated anyone who tried to thwart it as a collaborator and traitor - but after Hamas approved the tahdiah with Israel, they issued fatwas stating that anyone who fires [rockets] from Gaza into the occupiers' [territory] is a traitor and infidel.

"Some time ago, I read about a German who converted to Islam during World War I, and explained his decision as follows: 'I found that, in Islam, there is an unmediated [relationship] between man and God. The relationship between them is direct, and this is what persuaded me to convert.'

"[But] the [aforementioned] fatwas reveal that in today's Muslim [world], a sector of priests is emerging, which is monopolizing the faith, interpreting it, and applying ijtihad [i.e. personal judgment] in a way that harms the religion and demeans the tenets [of Islam].

"I know of a sheikh who banned the use of satellite dishes, and attacked people who purchased [them] - but later installed one on the roof of his own home. Asked to explain his conduct, he replied that he likes to watch [TV] programs in order to comment on them... Later, he lambasted the [Turkish TV soap opera] Muhannad and Nour. Asked why he watched it, he answered that his daughter is handicapped, and that if he forbade her to watch it she would set herself on fire..."

Most Fatwas Are Anti-Women

Al-Barghouti pointed out that most of the fatwas harmed women most of all. "Among the 'made-to-order' fatwas, there are some that permit all sorts of marriages, with various names, that are more like prostitution [than marriage]. There are also fatwas that generate dissent rather than unity, and incite to civil war - as if what we need is to follow primitive and ignorant [clerics] who, in the name of religion and devoutness, accuse others of heresy and of straying from the right path...

"An Egyptian cleric issued a fatwa that permits a working woman to breastfeed her [male] co-worker, which makes it religiously permissible for them to be alone in a room together. [1] He did not, however, tell us what would happen if that co-worker got greedy and asked for more and more [breastfeeding] every day..." [2]

"Do Women Need the Luxury of Seeing Out of Both Eyes?"

Dr. Khaled Al-Haroub, a Palestinian researcher at Cambridge University, wrote in a satirical piece published in the PA daily Al-Ayyam: "The nations are in a race to improve the level of education and employment for women, who constitute 50% of society, and the world is working to promote equality in job opportunities between men and women. Our sheikhs, on the other hand, regard women as a tempting piece of flesh that takes up space in the workplace for no good reason.

"In order to suppress the childish Freudian notions racing through their minds, they have come up with an innovation that puts the solutions offered by the other nations to shame. In their opinion, the solution [to the problem of women in the workplace] is for the woman to breastfeed her co-worker...

"Were it not for our sharp-witted sheikhs, we would have been afraid [to let] our women go to the market, where [danger] lies in wait for them day and night. Only our sheikhs - with their fatwas that penetrate the women's organs in order to protect them - [were astute enough] to realize that a veil with a slit for both eyes can cause civil war and corrupt youth, and thus to decree that [a woman must wear] a veil exposing only one eye. After all, do they need more than one eye to see their way around and examine the produce at the market? Do they [really] need the luxury of seeing out of both eyes? One is enough.

"[Our sheikhs] also had the perceptiveness to realize that women who wear eyeshadow are, [and always have been,] a grave [danger] to millions of young men throughout the ages, who collapse like a house of cards whenever they spy a woman's eye powdered in blue. [A veil] revealing only one eye will protect them against this terrible threat of beauty...

"I must say that a one-eyed veil has a certain modernistic [appeal]. Picture the right eye open, and the left hidden by a black veil [worn] over a black robe. Isn't that a captivating artistic image that even Salvador Dali, king of surrealists, could not have come up with? Moreover, we must remember that our honorable jurisprudents have granted women a great deal of freedom - which reflects the tremendous respect they have for them and for their liberty - by allowing them to choose, with complete independence, which eye to use and which eye to hide. Why, they can even switch between the right eye and the left! Does a Muslim Arab woman need more freedom than that?

"In the opinion of our great jurisprudents, women are a [source of] disaster. They are the root of all evil in the universe, and their every thought is devoted to tempting innocent men and leading them to hell. Therefore, the best [solution] is to marry them off at a tender age, as one of our genius jurisprudents recently decreed. This means marrying them off at the age of nine. The honorable sheikh justified this by saying that he sees many nine-year-old girls who display signs of [sexual] maturity and are ripe for marriage.

"Oh sheikh, you deserve the highest medal of honor for backwardness and atrophied [thinking]. If we had a shred of civil [responsibility], we would have sent you and many others of your ilk straight to jail, and left all of you to spend the rest of your lives there."

"If Not For [the Sheikhs], We Would Have Continued... Letting [Our Children Laugh and Chortle in the Company of That Scoundrel, Mickey Mouse"

"Imagine what a disaster it would be if we had no jurisprudents, clerics, or sheikhs to ward off the conspiracies hatched against us day and night by the infidel West, the atheist East, the sinful North and the pagan South. Every morning we wake up to a conspiracy, and every night we go to bed after nipping yet another plot in the bud.

"During the afternoon and the evening, we are [surrounded by] conspiracies, and we breathe them, read about them, see them flickering on the screen and hear about them on the radio. We find conspiracies in the elegant containers of women's beauty parlors, and conspiracies in sardine cans and tuna cans. We ordinary folk cannot [even] grasp the multitude of conspiracies that lie in wait for innocent men [in the form of] promiscuous women, or those that lie in wait for the innocent women [in the form of] wolf-like men, not to mention the conspiracies threatening our children...

"What would happen if we stopped the mouths of these honorable sheikhs with wax and shut them up in a lunatic asylum? Imagine the terrible catastrophe and the mental vacuum [that would ensue]... If not for them, we would never rest easy, [knowing that] they protect our borders and our border cities. If not for them, we would have continued to horribly neglect our children by letting them laugh and chortle in the company of that scoundrel, Mickey Mouse. In our ignorance, we though him an ordinary mouse until our sheikhs exposed him, Allah preserve them so that they [continue to] support us and [protect us] from our profound backwardness. [Thanks to them], we now see [Mickey Mouse] in all his hideousness: a minion of the cursed devil in the guise of an innocent mouse, [waiting] to inflict deadly damage on the minds of our children." [3]

In another Al-Ayyam article, Palestinian columnist 'Abd Al-Nasser Al-Najjar wrote about a recent fatwa permitting a woman to beat her husband: "The ultra-modern sheikh [who issued this fatwa] presented it as a shield that allows the woman to defend herself if [her husband] beats her up. The day after [it was issued], a heated debate broke out among the Al-Azhar scholars, who argued about the validity of such fatwas.

"We ask: Why involve religion in these issues and [thus] turn [religion] into a [symbol of] backwardness? Why issue fatwas permitting beatings and violence? Why shouldn't religion focus on the call for love, peace, and tranquility, instead of on the call to beat people and teach women karate?" [4]
_____________
[1] This fatwa argued that the breastfeeding creates a bond of kinship between the man and the women, making it permissible for them to be together in private. See MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No. 355, "Al-Azhar Lecturer Suspended after Issuing Controversial Fatwa Recommending Breastfeeding of Men by Women in the Workplace," May 25, 2008, http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA35507.

[2] Al-Hayat Al-Jadida (PA), October 21, 2008.

[3] Al-Ayyam (PA), September 29, 2008.

[4] Al-Ayyam (PA), November 11, 2008.

Taliban Rob Children of Will to Play

By Fawad Ali Shah

Mudassir Khan, aged nine, is playing with his cousins on a street in Sultanabad. Though his cousins seem to be enjoying each and every moment of the game, Mudassir’s face paints a different picture.

His movements lack the freedom visible in the other children. When asked why he is not enjoying the game, he murmurs, “I don’t want to play games.” Khan is one of the thousands of children forced to migrate to Karachi after the military operation was initiated in the area.

His father, Muzammal Khan, steps in to better explain Mudassir’s lack of interest in games. Taking the boy aside, he asks Mudassir to narrate his experiences of the Taliban but the child remains silent. “Once he was playing gulli danda, which was his favorite game, when a Talib slapped him and his friends,” reveals Muzzamil Khan, who used to run a medical store in Mingora.

“My son was not like this at all but the tormenting experiences of the past few months have scarred him deeply,” he adds, still trying to coerce the little boy to share his experiences. Mudassir’s eyes start to well up but casting an annoying look at his father, he manages to murmur, “He was very bad, very bad.”

“I was playing gulli danda when a man with a Kalashnikov and a stick in his hand came up to us. He slapped us because we were playing games of infidels,” he narrates, “The Talib said that infidels have created these games in order to deviate the attention of Muslim children and youth from jihad.” He adds that then the Talib forcefully took him to the mosque and since that day, he has never dared to play a game again.

However, the hatred for the Taliban that Mudassir now harbours was not always present. “They would teach me about religion and prayed five times a day,” he says. However, all that changed when the Taliban started beating up people.

He stated that his madrassah teacher once took his 13-year old schoolmate for jihad training. “Maulana sahib would give sermons on jihad, focusing on stories of the glorious past. That friend of mine wanted to be Muhammad Bin Qasim,” says the green-eyed Mudassir.

It may be noted here that after establishing themselves in the area, the Taliban are forcefully sending children to religious seminaries and mosques. Moreover, though the Taliban are against the modern education system and have destroyed many schools in the area, the son of Taliban spokesperson, Muslim Khan, is enrolled in the pharmacy department of the University of Peshawar, which is a co-education university. More interesting was the reply of Muslim Khan when this was pointed out, as he stated that “the study of medicine is allowed in Islam.”

“He is always nervous and jittery all the time,” Waqma, 28, Mudassir’s burqa-clad mother said, adding that the Mudassir’s face was red for quite some time after that slap.

When contacted for an expert’s opinion over the child’s ordeal, Psychologist Haleem Shah said that the child would not be able to recover any time soon. “If the situation is as the parents describe, it will take months for him to recover and possibly play again,” reckoned Shah.

As the children once again run towards the ground, Mudassir remains with his parents, softly whispering, “I don’t want to play.”

Source: Daily Times

Arrested Islamists planned to attack Jews in Morocco

RABAT (AFP) — A group of alleged Islamists recently arrested in Morocco planned to attack Jewish interests in the country, a court source said Thursday, citing the charges against them.

The suspects, alleged to be members of a cell that was part of the radical Islamist movement Salafia Jihadia, were also preparing attacks against Moroccan security services, the source said.

Details of the alleged attack plans were not available.

The cell -- Jamaat Al Mourabitine Al Jodod, or New Fighters Group -- allegedly began operating in March 2008 in southern
Morocco and sought to recruit militants from Koranic schools with the intention of infiltrating political parties.
Authorities announced their arrest on May 12 and they face charges including forming a criminal gang with the aim of carrying out "terrorist" acts. They are being held in jail.

"Police dismantled the cell as part of a regular operation in the battle against terrorism," the court source said.
Copyright © 2009 AFP.

Muslim Boys Responsible for Brutally Murdering Hindu Boy

A 14-year-old schoolboy from Kurla’s Bailbazar area was found murdered at Khalapur in Raigad district, bringing alive memories of the Adnan Patrawala and Mukeem Khan kidnap and murder cases.

Police said the body of the boy, Amandeep Banwait, was found in a ditch near a highway in Khalapur, face smashed beyond recognition. Using a tailor’s tag on the shirt as clue, Khalapur police traced the boy’s family.

Two college boys and a student of Class XII have been held in connection with the murder. Police inquiries reveal they were against the closeness of Amandeep with a girl, said to be the sister of two of the suspects .

Khalapur police had a tough time finding the identity of the victim. “He was in shirt and jeans. Except for a backpack, empty except for some pens and pencils, we found no belongings or any ID on him. Our only clue was the tag ‘Harish Tailor, Mumbai 70’ on his shirt. On the orders of Raigad SP Pratap Dighavkar, a 12-member team left for Mumbai. On contacting the local police, we learnt that Vinoba Bhave police had registered a complaint that one Amandeep Banwait had been missing since May 18,” said inspector Hindurao Padhalkar.

The complaint had been registered by Sahebsingh Banwait, saying his son Amandeep, a class 10 student, had not returned home after tuition.

Police enquiries with residents of the neighbourhood led them to the suspects. “Some residents told us they had heard of an affair between Amandeep and the cousin of two of the suspects. They said they had seen him and the girl’s elder brother warning Amandeep to stay away from her,” said Padhalkar.

Fahad, his brother, reported to be a minor, and their friend Salim have been held. “We arrested the three. They confessed that when Amandeep hadn’t paid heed to their warnings, they plotted to murder him. A day before abducting him, Fahad and Salim rode to Khalapur in a motorbike to ‘finalise’ the spot and on May 18, Amandeep was lured into accompanying them for a ‘sightseeing’ trip. He was taken to Khalapur. They have confessed to having strangled Amandeep and smashed his face with stones,” police added.

Fahad and Salim were remanded to police custody till June 2. Farhan was remanded till May 29 after his lawyer claimed his client was a minor.

Holy Land Foundation chief sentenced to 65 years

DALLAS — A founding member of what was once the nation's largest Muslim charity was sentenced to 65 years in prison Wednesday for funneling millions of dollars to the Palestinian militant group Hamas.

Shukri Abu Baker, 50, of Garland, was the first of five members of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development to be sentenced.

Ghassan Elashi, 55, of Richardson, also got 65 years. Another defendant, Mohammad El-Mezain, 55, was sentenced to 180 months for one count of conspiracy to support a terrorist organization.

After a jury failed to reach a verdict in 2007, the men were convicted in a second trial last November on 108 charges stemming from allegations the charity sent more than $12 million to Hamas. It's illegal to give support to Hamas, which has been listed by the U.S. as a terror group since 1995 and is blamed for hundreds of suicide bombings targeting Israeli civilians.

The charity leaders were convicted on charges ranging from supporting a terrorist organization to money laundering and tax fraud. The two men still to be sentenced — Mufid Abdulqader and Abdulrahman Odeh — were convicted of conspiracy.

The charity itself was convicted on 32 counts. It wasn't accused of violence, but of bankrolling schools and social welfare programs that the U.S. government says are controlled by Hamas.

The defendants said they only fed the needy and gave much-needed aid to a volatile region.

"I did it because I cared, not at the behest of Hamas," Abu Baker told the judge Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Jorge Solis cut off Abu Baker and told him: "You didn't tell the whole story. Palestinians were in a desperate situation, but that doesn't justify supporting Hamas."

The charity's supporters say the prosecution was a politically motivated product of former President George W. Bush's "war on terror" and a prime example of anti-Islamic hysteria after the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S.

Defense attorneys also protested that an Israel official was allowed to testify anonymously that Hamas members were among the leaders of the charity's benefactors. The Israeli agent, who testified under the pseudonym "Avi," also appeared at the 2007 trial.

Suspected Al Qaeda, Taliban Militants Destroy Pakistan Church, Christians Say

Suspected Muslim militants with links to the terror groups Al Qaeda and the Taliban attacked a historic church in northwestern Pakistan and burned Bibles and other Christian books, but police are reluctant to investigate the case and detain suspects, Christians said Tuesday, May 26.

The destruction of the St. George Grecian Church was discovered by workers renovating the building, said the church's pastor Ijaz Masih in a statement distributed by rights group International Christian Concern (ICC).

Masih said that shortly after he presided over a Sunday service, workers “were shocked when they arrived” in the morning of May 12, “and found the church's cross broken in pieces, the altar demolished and partially burned, Bibles and hymnbooks burned and torn apart, and the pews reduced to ashes.”

He said attackers also ransacked bathrooms and cemented over a plaque inscribed with the names of the donors responsible for the original construction of the building.

ICC quoted local Christians as saying they were “astounded” that the attackers could sneak into the church and vandalize it without being noticed by anyone in the neighborhood. “They are especially concerned because the church is located within a military zone and thus is considered to be in a very secure location.”

Ijaz said he had started as the pastor of St. George Church two years ago, and that the Christians in Bannu Cantt had been living peacefully with their Muslim neighbors. He believes the attack was carried out by “radical Muslims linked to the Taliban or Al Qaeda with the goal of provoking a clash between local Christians and Muslims.”

A Christian advocacy group in Pakistan, the Center for Legal Aid, Assistance, and Settlement (CLAAS), said that although police have registered the attack, “they are not investigating it as they would if the attack had been on a mosque.” There was no immediate comment from police, although the government has pledged to crackdown on Islamic extremists.

ICC Advocacy Director Jeremy Sewall told Worthy News in a statement that his group has urged Christians to "Please pray for the members of St. George, that God would give them courage in the midst of this frightening situation.”

Sewall said the attack comes amid concerns that that “Muslim radicals continue to operate with impunity in Pakistan," despite a recent military offensive against Taliban militant positions in areas such as the Swat Valley in North-West Frontier Province (NWFP), some 160 kilometers (100 miles) from Islamabad, the capital.

Girl receives damages for genital mutilation

A 19-year-old girl in Gothenburg has been awarded compensation after having been subjected to genital mutilation in Somalia as an 11-year-old.

The girl was awarded 390,000 kronor ($52,000) in damages for abuse and gross violation of integrity (grov fridskränkning), the Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority (Brottsoffermyndigheten) has announced.

Then 11-years-old, the girl was taken on holiday to Somalia in 2001. While there she was subjected to genital mutilation.

She was held down by her mother and two other women while her clitoris and inner labia were removed by a man in return for payment.

The girl's vagina was then sewn up down to the opening of her urethra. The whole procedure was conducted without anaesthetic.

For several years after the violation the girl was subjected to repeated examinations by her mother who forced her fingers into her vagina to check that her virginity remained intact.

She also repeatedly assaulted her daughter with various implements including books, a curtain rail and a belt.

The girl's mother later explained in her court trial that the girl was taken to Somalia to be "cleansed".

The mother was later convicted for the violation in the Court of Appeal (Hovrätten) and ordered to pay her daughter 450,000 kronor in compensation.

In its decision to award the damages to the 19-year-old the Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority wrote that the "genital mutilation resembled torture and was intended to limit her possibilities to have a normal sex life."

For the "exceptionally serious violation of her personal integrity" and the subsequent abuse, the girl was awarded a total of 390,000 kronor.

The authority will also later consider whether the girl is entitled to further damages for pain and suffering.

Iran stays hanging of murderer who killed as minor

So far in 2009 Iran has hanged at least 116 people

Iran's judiciary chief has halted the execution of a man who was condemned to death for committing a murder when he was aged 15, his lawyer told AFP on Wednesday.

Mohammad Reza Hadadi was to be hanged on Wednesday at Adel Abad prison in the southern city of Shiraz for the abduction and murder of an elderly man six years ago.

"The execution has been halted following the order of the chief of judiciary Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahrudi," Mohammad Mostafai said, adding that the supreme court has also asked for a review of the case.

Hadadi, now aged 20, was arrested in October 2003 over the murder and condemned to death in January 2004.

Iran earlier this month hanged a woman convicted of a murder committed when she was 17, an execution that sparked international outrage and led the Islamic republic to stop two similar hangings.

Iran is a signatory to a UN convention on children's rights which stipulates that members will not execute convicts found guilty of committing crimes as minors.

According to London-based rights group Amnesty International, more than 130 other juvenile offenders are known to face death sentences in Iran.

Iran's judiciary has drawn up a bill that aims to make it difficult for the courts to sentence minors to death.

The bill has been approved by parliament's judicial commission and appears to be an improvement on the existing penal code under which the age of legal responsibility is nine for a girl and 15 for a boy.

However, despite its adoption by the house, the bill has yet to be rubber-stamped by Iran's conservative watchdog, the Guardians Council, before being written into law.

The council has in the past binned several reform-oriented bills after ruling them contradictory to Islam and the Iranian constitution.

Crimes including murder, drug trafficking and rape are punishable by death under the Sharia-based law practised in Iran since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

So far this year, Iran has hanged at least 116 people, according to an AFP count, compared with 246 in 2008.

Amnesty has said Iran applied the death penalty more than any other country apart from China in 2007, executing 335 people.

Tehran says the use of the death penalty is a bid to improve security and protect society.

Pakistan suicide car bomb kills 70, wounds 200

A suicide car-bomber blew himself up as he tried to force his vehicle into Lahore's police headquarters on Wednesday, killing at least 70 people and wounding more than 200, police and medics said.

"We have reports of 70 killed, so far," said senior Lahore police official Pervez Butt. A doctor at one of the city's main hospitals said that more than 200 people had been wounded.

There was no claim of responsibility, but the blast comes as the army battles militants in the Swat region of the country's northwest in its most concerted action to push back a growing Taliban insurgency.

The attack also hit as General David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command, was in Islamabad for meetings with government and military leaders.

Rescue workers carried out the injured on their backs over the debris, while one man in a traditional white shirt lay trapped and helpless under stones and wooden planks, as people tried to dig him out.

"It was a suicide car bomb attack," Lahore city police official Omar Ahmad told AFP.

The injured lay trapped and helpless underneath the debris after the attack in the city's commercial district, two months after a deadly assault on a police training academy near Lahore claimed by Pakistan's Taliban commander.

"A vehicle bomb exploded just outside the police rescue offices, destroying the office, damaging nearby buildings and injuring people," Chief of Lahore City Administration Sajjad Bhutta told reporters.

"The vehicle tried to break the police barrier and enter the building, but it exploded before entering the building. The building collapsed and people may be trapped under the rubble."

Local television showed images of frantic crowds gathering around devastated buildings, some reduced to piles of rubble, while other structures had their windows blown out by the force of the blast.

Cars were flattened, while around the blast site rows of motorcycles lay on their sides, knocked over or destroyed by the explosion.

On March 30, attackers armed with guns, grenades and suicide vests stormed a police training center on the outskirts of Lahore, unleashing eight hours of gun battles and killing seven police cadets and a civilian.

That attack was claimed by Pakistani Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud -- a man with a $5 million bounty on his head offered by the United States.

The United States needs Pakistani action against militants in its northwest to defeat al-Qaeda and disrupt support for the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Radical cleric's sons admit £1m car scam

Three sons of jailed cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri have admitted exploiting a loophole in the vehicle registration system to commit a £1m luxury car scam.

His sons Hamza Kamel, 22, and Mohamed Mostafa, 27, ran the two-year fraud with his stepson Mohssin Ghailam, 28.

Southwark Crown Court heard they targeted cars in long-stay car parks, fraudulently obtaining their log books and keys before selling the cars on.

Four other London men also admitted their involvement.

'Sophisticated' fraud

Radical Muslim preacher Abu Hamza was jailed in 2006 for inciting murder and hate in speeches he made at Finsbury Park Mosque in north London.

On Wednesday the court heard that his sons were arrested in November last year, following a police investigation into the organised theft and resale of luxury cars in London.

Prosecutor Martyn Bowyer told the hearing: "This was a sophisticated, well-planned and professionally executed enterprise."

The gang identified luxury cars such as Mercedes, BMWs and Range Rovers left in long-stay car parks in London and applied to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) to change the address.

If the DVLA did not receive a reply from the original address within 14 days, a new log book would be sent out to an address supplied by the gang.

The defendants would then inform the DVLA that the name of the registered keeper had also changed, enabling them to obtain keys for the vehicle.

The gang then stole the cars, selling them to unsuspecting buyers or using them as collateral to take out loans which they never repaid.

Mr Bowyer said: "This was the defendants seeking to exploit a loophole in the system at the DVLA."

Police identified 32 vehicles that were used in the fraud, valued at more than £1m.

Kamel, from Acton, west London, admitted five counts of handling stolen goods and laundering more than £14,000 of money in relation to the scam.

Mostafa, also from Acton, pleaded guilty to two counts of fraud by using false ID to secure a £12,000 loan and to obtain keys for a BMW.

Ghailam, from Shepherd's Bush, west London, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud.

Mohammed Chiadmi, 31, from Maida Vale, his brother Abdul Chiadmi, 22, from Ladbroke Grove, Khalid Jebari, 22, from Pimlico, and Hamza Mrimou, 27, from Fulham, admitted fraud, handling stolen goods and money laundering.

All the defendants are due to be sentenced on Thursday.

Religious police want cameras to monitor youth

Saudi Arabia's religious police want to install surveillance cameras in shopping centres throughout the country in order to watch young people. "We will place surveillance cameras in all shopping centres and public places to monitor the behaviour of young people," said General Abdel Aziz al-Hamin, chief of the committee for the promotion of virtue and the prevention of vice, quoted by Saudi daily Okaz on Wednesday.

"Our objective is to correct the mistakes made by some youths, in order to protect their moral integrity," said al-Hamin.

However, Saudi Arabia's religious police have been accused by many Saudis of violating young people's privacy by providing the media with the names of those who are caught engaging in behaviour considered in breach of Islamic Sharia law.

Their names are then published in Saudi newspapers.

Al-Hamin, however, has denied the claims and said he never handed over the names of anyone to the media.

In a separate incident, a court in the holy city of Medina on Tuesday acquitted two religious police.

They were accused of having caused the death of four young people, two men and two women, who died in a car accident while they tried to escape from the religious police after being caught together.

Sharia law prohibits unmarried and unrelated men and women to travel together in a car.

The religious police or committee for the promotion of virtue and the prevention of vice is a government bureaucracy in charge of enforcing Sharia law. It has more than 3,500 members, as well as volunteers.

Turkish Author May Face Year in Prison for "Blasphemy"

A Turkish author on trial over accusations that his latest book insulted Islam denied the charges Tuesday and insisted he was respectful of religion.

Nedim Gursel faces up to a year in prison if found guilty on charges of humiliating religious values and inciting religious hatred in his novel "The Daughters of Allah."

Gursel, who was born in Turkey but has French citizenship and is based in France, is the latest intellectual to be prosecuted in Turkey under laws that restrict free speech.

A case against him began last year after a citizen complained that the novel — set in the 6th century and describing the advent of Islam — was blasphemous. Gursel has repeatedly said his book, published in Turkey last year, is fictitious and that he did not intend to offend.

Gursel is accused of mocking religious figures in his novel.

Prosecutors investigating the case initially ruled there were no grounds to put Gursel on trial, but that decision was overturned by a court, forcing authorities to press charges.

"I am respectful of faiths," Gursel said following a court hearing Tuesday, where his trial was adjourned until June 25. "For an author to be prosecuted for a novel does not suit the Turkish Republic."

At a hearing earlier this month, prosecutors said there was no evidence the book incited hatred, raising hopes that Gursel will be acquitted. It is not unusual in the Turkish justice system for prosecutors to press for a defendant's acquittal.

In 2006, charges against Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk for insulting Turkey were dropped on a technicality. Turkey has since amended some laws in an attempt to promote free speech, and insists that few intellectuals have ended up in prison.

But human rights groups and the European Union, which Turkey hopes to join, say the laws are used to harass dissident intellectuals and insist they be scrapped.

The book is scheduled to be published in France later this year.

Police Raid Apartment, 2 in Custody

"A source in federal law enforcement told Fox Chicago that the case is similar to one that unfolded in New York yesterday" -- that is, May 21, when the Bronx synagogue plot was foiled. Bronx synagogue plot background here.
Glenda Johnson saw so many police and plain clothed federal agents on her block that she thought someone had been shot.

"The police was so crowded, you couldn't even walk past. They was in trucks, they was in cars, they was in regular cars. It looked like someone had killed someone," said Johnson.

That swarm of badges consisted of the FBI, Chicago Police and the Joint Terrorism Task Force. In their sights were two buildings on the 6300 block of North Artesian. People who live in a six flat there say the feds were very interested in its basement, specifically, two storage lockers.

A spokesperson for the FBI confirms a search warrant was executed at the building as part of an ongoing investigation. Glenda Johnson says an FBI agent made the search sound extremely urgent.

“They was looking for someone who lives in this building. So I was like ‘what's the cause?’ They said ‘we don't want to say yet, but it's a life and death situation.’ I was like ‘wow,’” said Johnson.

A source in federal law enforcement told Fox Chicago that the case is similar to one that unfolded in New York yesterday.

Taliban: "We will fight for the enforcement of sharia law till the last drop of our blood"

The Taliban urged Mingora residents on Monday to return to the town where they promised not to attack the security forces because of concern for the safety of civilians. Asked if that meant a ceasefire, Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan said, “No... Our aides will remain there in Mingora.” “We will fight for the enforcement of sharia law till the last drop of our blood,” he told AFP. agencies.

Source: Daily Times

Muslim associations sue policeman for allegedly desecrating a Koran

Muslim associations in Athens have filed a lawsuit against a policeman who allegedly desecrated a copy of the Koran last week, media reported on Monday (May 25th). Last Thursday, the policeman allegedly took a Koran from a customer during a police check at an Athens coffee shop, ripped it apart, threw it on the floor and stomped on it. Police say the officer did not know it was Islam's holy book.

The Pakistani community in Greece called on the government to assume responsibility for the incident and demanded an apology from authorities. The incident prompted two days of protests by hundreds of Muslims in central Athens. Violent clashes with police on Friday injured at least 14 people and damage several businesses; 46 people were arrested.

Muslim terrorists free three Filipino teachers

Muslim militants on Tuesday freed three teachers after four months of jungle captivity in the southern Philippines despite a refusal to pay ransom.

The Jan. 23 abductions from a boat off Zamboanga city were among several kidnappings-for-ransom blamed on the Abu Sayyaf extremist group and its allied gunmen.

The teachers' abductions were strongly condemned because they were working to provide education to underprivileged youths.

The Abu Sayyaf militants are still holding at least four hostages, including a Sri Lankan peace activist on Basilan island and an Italian Red Cross worker on nearby Jolo.

Gunmen handed over Quizon Freires, Janette Delos Reyes and Rafael Mayonado to a government negotiator in Mohamad Ajul township on Basilan.

The teachers were brought by speedboat to nearby Zamboanga, where they met their parents in tearful reunions and underwent medical checkups, Mayor Celso Lobregat said.

The three visibly lost weight and were still in shock but appeared to be in good health.

``They're still in a lot of stress but they're fine,'' Lobregat told The Associated Press by telephone. ``We thank God that they're back with us, alive.''

The kidnappers were demanding a ransom of $53,000 (2.5 million pesos) up to the last minute, but government negotiators stuck to a no-ransom policy, Lobregat said. He was unaware what prompted the kidnappers to release their captives.

Last week, Abu Sayyaf militants beheaded a kidnapped farm owner in Basilan apparently because his family failed to pay ransom, military officials said.

Navy Commodore Alex Pama, who heads a regional anti-kidnapping force, said two of the gunmen involved in the teachers' snatching have been captured by troops.

Groups of gunmen stalk potential victims in urban areas, carry out abductions, then hand over the victims to the mountain-based Abu Sayyaf militants, who keep the hostages and negotiate for a ransom, military officials said, citing statements from captured kidnappers.

The Abu Sayyaf, which has about 400 fighters, has been blamed for numerous kidnappings, bombings and beheadings. It is believed to have received funds from al-Qaida and is on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations.

Hizballah’s Phoneprints All Over Hariri Assassination?

By W. Thomas Smith, Jr.

The Lebanon-based Jihadist terrorist group, Hizballah, is now believed to have been directly involved in the 2005 Valentine's Day Massacre of 23 people in Beirut – including former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri (the primary target of the bomb-assassins) – according to a May 23 article in DER SPIEGEL.

No real surprise. But will the forthcoming revelations be enough to quash Hizballah’s push less than three weeks before the June 7 parliamentary elections in Lebanon wherein the terrorist group is already attempting to manipulate the outcome through its classic methods of intimidation? And will the revelations be enough to shut down the Syrian-Iranian-Hizballah operations room in Lebanon.

Difficult to say. What we do know is that Hizballah – which former U.S. Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff says, “makes al Qaeda look like a minor league team” – has a media/propaganda arm that is second to none. Its military wing is stronger – and frankly has more political leverage – than the Lebanese army and police (both of which have been heavily infiltrated by Hizballah). Hizballah’s possession of huge stockpiles of military grade weapons – staged throughout the country (in violation of both United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1559 and 1701) – has never been adequately challenged. And if Hizballah doesn’t get what it wants from the so-called democratically elected government of Lebanon, the terrorist group and its allies will attack the Lebanese people as they did in May 2008 with impunity.

Now, “the United Nations special tribunal investigating the murder [of Hariri] has reached surprising new conclusions -- and it is keeping them secret,” says Erich Follath, writing for the German-based weekly magazine. “…investigators now believe Hizballah was behind the Hariri murder.”

Counterterrorism officials with the pro-democracy World Council for the Cedars Revolution (WCCR) say the “surprising new conclusions” are simply a reaffirmation of what they have been reporting for the past four years.

“The Syrians planned the operation which was then coordinated through the joint-operations war room between the Syrians, Hizballah and its Iranian overlords, and the security apparatus of the previous [Emile] Lahoud regime,” says Col. Charbel Barakat (Lebanese Army, ret.), a former infantry brigade commander who today serves as senior security advisor to the WCCR and directs the council’s office of counterterrorism. “We have long-believed Hizballah executed the operation, and the group did so in concert with the three regimes.”

According to the article, who killed Hariri “has been the source of wild speculation.” Suspects have included everyone from the Israelis to Syria’s intelligence services to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, even to Al Qaeda.

In the wake of Hariri’s assassination, a UN-approved investigative team was established, which ultimately determined that Syrian and Lebanese officials were responsible. But as Follath writes, “the smoking gun, the final piece of evidence, was not found.” A UN special tribunal revisited the investigation in March 2009, and that tribunal has now “yielded new and explosive results.”

According to Follath, Lebanese security forces’ intelligence expert Capt. Wissam Eid, who himself was assassinated Jan. 25, 2008, had determined that eight cell phones (purchased on the same day in the Lebanese city of Tripoli) “were activated six weeks before the assassination, and … were apparently tools of the hit team that carried out the terrorist attack.”

The eight phones have since been referred to as the "first circle of hell."

A so-called "second circle of hell," approximately 20 additional phones that were “noticeably often” in close proximity to “the first circle,” belonged to the "operational arm" of Hizballah.

Apparently one of the Hizballah operatives “committed the unbelievable indiscretion of calling his girlfriend from one of the ‘hot’ phones.” This led investigators to the suspected mastermind of the operation, Hajj Salim, who assumed command of Hizballah’s military wing following the Feb. 2008 assassination of the previous commander, the notorious Imad Mughniyeh, in Damascus.

The tribunal’s collected evidence runs even deeper, according to DER SPIEGEL’s source: “They have apparently discovered which Hizballah member obtained the small Mitsubishi truck used in the attack. They have also been able to trace the origins of the explosives, more than 1,000 kilograms of TNT, C4 and hexogen.”

Barakat says, “Our intelligence assessment has always indicated that the Hariri assassination – decided and ordered at the highest levels of government in Damascus and Beirut – was a direct-action operation carried out by Hizballah’s special hit squads. What’s worse is that the joint-operations room, known as ‘Ghurfat al amaliyat al mushtaraka,’ which coordinated the attack, was never dissolved even after the Syrians were kicked out in 2005.”

Follath writes, “One can only speculate over the reasons why the Hariri tribunal is holding back its new information,” but adds the investigators may fear such revelations might inflame the already caustic situation in Lebanon.

Briton faces adultery charge in UAE

A British woman is in custody in the United Arab Emirates after being arrested on suspicion of committing adultery.

Sally Antia, 44, who has lived in Dubai for more than a decade, was detained earlier this month following a raid on a hotel.

According to reports, she is locked in a custody battle with her husband, who is seeking a divorce, over the couple's two daughters.

The Sun reported that Mrs Antia's husband Vincent, 48, tipped off police, accusing her of having an affair and claiming she was in a five-star hotel with her lover.

A spokeswoman for the Foreign Office said: "We can confirm a British national, Sally Antia, was arrested on May 2 for adultery and is currently being detained pending a court hearing expected in the next couple of weeks. Next of kin have been informed and we are providing consular assistance."

The last posting by Mrs Antia, who is originally from Liverpool, on her Friends Reunited page read: "Living in Dubai for the last 12 years.

"Married with 2 girls now aged 11 and 13. Enjoying the sunshine, but often home to watch a match. Massive Red fan. Happy and healthy...what more can you ask for?"

News of Mrs Antia's plight comes a month after another British mother, Marnie Pearce, was released from a Dubai jail.

Ms Pearce, 40, originally from Bracknell, Berkshire, was given a three-month sentence after a Dubai court found she had cheated on her Egyptian ex-husband Ihab El Labban - a charge she has denied.

The supply teacher lost custody of her sons, Laith, eight, and Ziad, four, in February and had faced deportation on her release from prison, but this has been put on hold while she fights to win back her children.

Bangladeshi single mother caned over paternity row

A 22-year-old unmarried Bangladeshi woman who was caned 39 times for alleging a neighbour was the father of her son is fighting for her life in hospital, police said.

The case has shocked the impoverished Muslim-majority nation, with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina ordering the woman to be shifted from her village home to the capital for proper medical treatment.

Local police chief Moshiur Rahman told AFP that the woman, from Comilla, 70 kilometres (43 miles) east of the capital Dhaka, had angered Islamic clerics when she told friends that a neighbour had fathered her six-year-old son.

They called her and the alleged father to appear before a makeshift Islamic court, but the man denied the paternity claim, Rahman said.

"He held a Koran in one hand and swore to the village clerics that he was not the father of the boy. The village court found him not guilty," he said.

"They also issued a fatwa that the woman should be caned 39 times for lying."

The woman, seriously injured after the caning, was admitted to a local hospital but was later shifted to the country's largest hospital in Dhaka on the orders of the Prime Minister, Rahman said.

Two of the clerics have been arrested for repression of women, he said, and DNA testing had been arranged to determine the father of the child.

'If We Now Kill Schoolgirls, You Shouldn't Be Surprised'

By Matthias Gebauer and Shoib Najafizada

Responding to threats from the Taliban, at least 10 girls' schools have shut down near Kunduz in northern Afghanistan. Visiting the schools is a dangerous proposition -- a trip leading directly into the heart of Islamist territory.

When the deputy director of Aqtash High School talks of the government, he isn't referring to Hamid Karzai's central government in Kabul. Nor does he refer to the provincial administration in Kunduz. "The Taliban are our government," Bashir says. "They have taken over our region, their commanders give the orders here."

Bashir is standing in a dusty classroom on the ground floor of his modern school, roughly half an hour from Kunduz by car. As recently as just one month ago, he says, some 400 girls were still coming to the school in three daily shifts to learn reading, writing and arithmetic. Figures and formula are still scrawled across the blackboard.
But now, the girls' classrooms have been left to deteriorate. The desks and chairs are still laid out in neat rows, but a film of dust has collected, and Bashir stands helplessly in the middle of the room. "Parents in Aqtash are afraid to send their girls to school anymore, after the death threats," he explains. The school director speaks quietly and carefully. He too is afraid, and several of his teachers double as informants for the Taliban. The bearded fighters, he says, would certainly not like it if they knew a reporter was at the school in Aqtash. "You should leave quickly if you want to get out of Aqtash alive," he whispers.

'Apprehended and Killed'

Bashir's warning is hardly an exaggeration. Not 30 minutes after our arrival in Aqtash, located 15 kilometers northeast of Kunduz just off the main north-south arterial, a group of a dozen Taliban fighters, armed with AK-47s, gathers in front of the blue arch at the entrance to the school. "What do you want here?" one of the fighters calls. "This is our region, the Islamic Emirate of North Afghanistan."

Find out how you can reprint this SPIEGEL ONLINE article in your publication.
The trip to the Aqtash school is a trip into the heart of the empire of the Taliban, which controls large areas around Kunduz. Minutes pass before the fighters clear out of the way, allowing us to leave.
The trip out of Aqtash is hardly any less dangerous and provides a look at the situation not 15 kilometers from the German military camp in Kunduz. There are Taliban checkpoints all over the roads, and they are well armed. The Taliban commander in the region is a man named Khalid Salim. He is young and has a reputation for brutality. Salim is on the most wanted list for the region surrounding Kunduz. "Those who work for the government or for the Western soldiers," says one of his men at a checkpoint, "are immediately apprehended and killed."

The fate of the school in Aqtash, which received a new roof just one year ago, paid for out of German development funds, is hardly unique. At least 10 girls' sections of schools located near Kunduz have been closed down in the last three weeks after receiving threats from the Taliban. Parents simply stopped sending their children to school because of the danger. And the closures haven't just been in the region of Char Dara southwest of Kunduz, a well known Taliban hotspot. Schools in three other districts have likewise ceased operation.

No German Soldiers

It didn't take long for news of the school closures to reach the highest echelons of government in both Kabul and Berlin. Stories about schools buckling to the Taliban are exactly what they hoped to avoid. On the one hand, it shows that the Taliban is increasingly gaining the upper hand right outside the front gates of the German military camp in Kunduz. Neither the German army, the Bundeswehr, nor the local police force are effective against the Islamist extremists. At the most, they can temporarily dislodge the Taliban, but they then move on to terrorize other areas where there are no German soldiers.

Most of all, though, the closures threaten one of the few successes that the Germans have had in Afghanistan. It is an achievement that has been repeatedly trumpeted by those in favor of continued engagement; hardly a German politician has refrained from mentioning how encouraging it is to visit a girls' school in Afghanistan. Now, though, the schools -- just like in the south where recent acid attacks against school girls have hit the headlines -- have become a potent propaganda tool for the Taliban. Western troops, so goes the message, can't do anything to stop the Islamist fighters.
The tactics used by the Taliban are shockingly simple. Dozens of so-called "night letters," which are affixed to the doors of schools in the dead of night, are piled on Muqim Halimi's huge desk. Halimi is the commissioner of education for the Kunduz province and a crowd of men are waiting outside his office, most of them hoping to be able to bribe their way into good grades for their children. But when Halimi hears that a German reporter wants to talk about the closure of the girls' schools, he clears the room so he can talk undisturbed.

After confirming the closures, he reads aloud from the Taliban night letters, as simply formulated as they are explicit. "As of today," he reads from a message from Aqtash, "girls are no longer allowed to attend school." The letter is marked with a logo of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan -- in English, yet another indication of just how well organized the Taliban are in the German area of operation.

'If We Now Kill Schoolgirls...'

Another threat letter depicts a schoolgirl at the gallows. "We have warned you," reads the message. "If we now kill schoolgirls, you shouldn't be surprised."

Halimi is open in his description of the precarious situation the schools find themselves in. "There is no police there and even the army is afraid to go there," he says. "What should I do, as a civilian, against the Taliban?"

Alarmed about the reports, Afghan Interior Minister Hanif Atmar has rebuked the Kunduz police chief over the phone. The school closures, he says, are a "disgrace for Afghanistan," he says, demanding that something be done. But police chief Abdul Racak also doesn't know what to do. Last week he tried to send a police patrol to Aqtash, but they came under fire almost as soon as they turned off the main road. Two police officers were killed in the attack.

The reaction from the German camp in Kunduz is also a mixture of dismay and helplessness. The security situation is so poor at the moment that neither the military nor their civilian assistants can visit Aqtash themselves. Realistically, though, there isn't much they can do to combat the threats of the Taliban. There are some 650 schools in the region surrounding Kunduz and the German theater of operation is almost the size of the German state of Hesse or the US state of Massachusetts. With a German contingent of just 667 soldiers, security simply cannot be guaranteed.

Reports about the closures of the girls' schools aren't the only indications that the Kunduz region is at risk. The German military has noted that the Taliban threats began at the exact same time as attacks against German soldiers began to increase in both number and sophistication. Since the end of April, 19 patrols have come under attack, with one soldier losing his life in an April 29 attack. So far in May there have been four well organized assaults with soldiers wary that the next one could come at any time. Nobody believes that the correlation between the school threats and the attacks is a coincidence.
The reaction to the threats has become almost routine in recent months. The Afghans, so goes the formula, have to use their army to establish security in threatened areas like Aqtash. The Germans have held talks with their Afghan partners in the hopes that they will launch an offensive in Aqtash. German troops will support the operation, but Afghan troops should be the ones at the front.

But it would surprise no one were further girls' schools to shut their doors by the time such an operation is launched.

Still, the news isn't all bad. At the girls' school in Qosh Tappeh, likewise near Kunduz, the school director, a veteran of the mujahedeen, took things into his own hands. When the Taliban showed up to his school for the second time to present their threats, he found a uniquely Afghan solution to the problem. He told his visitors that, when it comes to fighting to the death, he is much more experienced than they. Should they like to find out for sure, he offered, he would be happy to accommodate them.

His threat seemed to have worked. The girls in Qosh Tappeh continue to attend school.